Canon Gl1 Minidv Digital Optically Superior To Sony Minidv Hd, Or Avchd For New Camcorder, Or Stay With Gl1??
Minidv hd, or avchd for new camcorder, or stay with Gl1?? - canon gl1 minidv digital optically superior to sony
I get a new camcorder that is smaller and easier / faster for video editing ...
I currently use a Canon GL1, but it is too large for Cary, and the snow ..
I do not have 100 tapes and tape-editing is a pain, so I have about the use of AVCHD and Final Cut Express is one for editing, so I know it is compatible, but I've heard that the quality is not so good is
The quality is very important and I want to move into a high-definition camera, does anybody know what is best? or it makes sense to keep the GL1?
|
2 comments:
I am a little divided on this issue. It is inevitable is that the standard HD media, but that does not mean the standard definition is obsolete in the short term. Sure, HD good, but somewhat useful at this time. Even with the Blue Ray will be more accessible, HD remains a challenge for the review. On one side of HD material takes a lot of space on your computer. And there is also a problem of how to watch HD pictures. Blue Ray burners are not in question, so that would be the best method to re-export the edited video back to HDV and then play on your TV via HDMI. Can not be a bad idea to keep your GL1.
Of course it is always tempting to follow the latest high-definition gadget, and in this case I recommend) HDV on HDD (hard disk drive. As a user of Avid HDV, I understand the frustration he has with the tape-based workflow. It's annoying when bands, assembly, but HDV is by far the best option for the following reasons:
QUALITY 1): As you said, a bit more compressed or HDDHDV one, which means a lower quality. Not bad by any means, but not as good as HDV.
2) Compatibility: I think you mentioned. Mini DV is compatible with virtually all editing systems out there. Disk has a few options, but still limited. Final Cut Express and Sony Vegas are the options, to name a few.
3) Storage: It is the most important factor for me. HDV offers the cheapest, safest and most convenient data file. The option to store the records on inexpensive MiniDV cassettes. With the hard disk is to limit the camcorder hard drive, and her team. Of course, you can store files on an external hard drive, but it is not so easy.
If you decide to go HDV, here are some I recommend:
CONSUMERS
Canon HV30 $ 780
Sony HDR-HC9 $ 1,000
Prosumer
HVX200A Panasonic, Sony PMW-EX1, JVC GY-HD110U, Canon XH-A1
PROFESSIONAL
Scarlet (not available until 2009)
There is no such thing as a best vidcam. the question of what to do with it. In fact, it is not a vidcam HD under $ 800. and if so, the goal is garbage. AVCHD is not recommended (by me). compress the file so that if you actually loaded into the PC is almost triple the size of the file. Even if you do not have the latest PC, which can store up to 10 hours to download them. Vidcams HDV is used for a reason. Hard new compact files, but not as much as AVCHD, and can also see pictures kind of flat Compard HDV. I would stay in the range of 800-1000. not be tempted to get AVCHD campaigns in 1299. TIP: The black 800-900 vidcams produce a much better quality than the older styles.these Siver are my opinions. Take what you expect. im sure that everyone has their own opinion
Post a Comment